123,780 Registered Members as of 11/23/2014.
Abdomen » Hepatobiliary
Hepatic Hemangioendothelioma
Author(s): Chaitali Shah, FRCR
ArticleOther contents by this Author
 
 
Introduction

Hemangioendotheliomas are benign vascular mesenchymal tumors that present in infancy [usually before 6 months] and may pose problems due to ensuing complications. The liver is the organ most commonly involved; however splenic, tracheal, pulmonary, GI tract, thymic, pancreatic and meningeal involvements have been reported. These tumors, if small usually involute spontaneously, however patients may succumb to complications.

Histology

These tumors are anastomosing arterio-venous channels lined by endothelial cells.

Clinical presentation

The neonate may present with asymptomatic hepatomegaly or with complications such as high output cardiac failure, consumptive coagulopathy with thrombocytopenia [Kasabach - Merritt syndrome], disseminated intravascular coagulation, anemia, and encroachment of the surrounding tissues. These patients may also present with cutaneous hemangiomas. Few rare cases of malignant conversion to angiosarcoma have also been reported.

Ultrasound features

Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality almost always employed to diagnose this infantile hepatic tumor. Hemangioendotheliomas have a varied appearance ranging from a solitary solid appearing lesion to a multifocal variegated cystic mass. Ultrasound can accurately arrive at a diagnosis if the vascular cystic component is the predominant feature. High intratumoral flow may be apparent on Doppler. The cystic spaces may be vascular and may completely fill with color on Doppler examination or may represent areas of cystic necrosis. Sometimes calcifications may be seen in the mass. If the hepatic tumor is large enough, a prenatal diagnosis can also be made, with the tumor appearing as a highly echogenic lesion in the liver.


Caption : Saggital sonogram of the liver.

Description : Saggital view of the liver demonstrates a large multi-cystic mass occupying most of the right lobe. The liver is enlarged.
Please click here to view the source of this image.

Other modalities

Additional imaging may be required to confirm the diagnosis and is commonly performed with CT to fully determine the extent of the lesion. On CT scan the tumor has been described as a hypo- isodense mass with significant post contrast enhancement. MRI and nuclear scans can also be performed. Since most of these patients are managed on a medical basis [treated with steroids], follow up volume imaging of these tumors and its perfusion will be necessary, underscoring the importance of careful pretreatment measurements.

Closest Differential Diagnosis

Hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma forms the closest differential for this cystic mass. It is important to differentiate it from a hemangioendothelioma, as the former warrants surgery for definitive treatment. On sonography, a hamartoma may appear as a non-specific multicystic mass, with the cysts filled with clear or gelatinous fluid. But a highly vascular mass favors the possibility of a hemangioendothelioma. Sometimes though, only histology can distinguish the two entities.

References

1. Chen CC, et al. Hepatic hemangioendothelioma in children: analysis of thirteen cases. Acta Paed Taiwan. 2003 Jan-Feb; 44(1): 8-13.

2. Wong DC, Masel JP. Infantile hepatic haemangioendothelioma. Australas Radiol. 1995 May; 39(2): 140-4.

3. Keslar PJ, et al. From the archives of the AFIP. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver revisited. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3): 657-70.

4. Berger TM, et al. Imaging diagnosis and follow-up of infantile hepatic haemangioendothelioma: a case report. Eur J Pediatr. 1994 Feb; 153(2): 100-2.

5. Kardorff R, et al. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver--sonographic diagnosis and follow-up. Ultraschall Med. 2001 Dec; 22(6): 258-64.

6. Srivastava DN, et al. Colour Doppler flow imaging of focal hepatic lesions. Australas Radiol. 2000 Aug; 44(3): 285-9.

7. Stocker JT, Ishak KG. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol. 1983 Jul-Sep; 1(3): 245-67.